http://www.yorkshirepost.co.uk/news/at-a-glance/main-section/teenager-comes-forward-over-baby-found-at-scunthorpe-recycling-plant-1-4508353#
Yes, if you have read the link you will be shocked. A body of a newborn baby was found in a skip in Winterton, Lincolnshire.
A teenager has come forward as the mother however it is unknown the cause of death. This is a heartbreaking story about a newborn baby that never got to start its life. And I really hope that the parents had nothing to do with the death. It is such an awful situation and I hope it was a tragic accident.
However the police are still not sure how the body came to be in the skip.
My heart goes out to the family and the poor soul who found the baby on his morning rounds.
Now, I don’t condone violence but I will state that sometimes some chauvinistic, sexist pigs need a good clip round the ear’ole.
It seems there are certain men in Worcester that think women are a piece of meat, put there for their pleasure and pickings. Now I’m not a feminist, I just believe in equality. The amount of times I’ve had males grab me, touch me and be generally degrading towards me just because they have had a drink which clearly makes it acceptable.
Last night I was out in Velvet in Worcester, when I noticed a man staring. Eerie stare from across the smoking area. Now I thought nothing of it and continued on with my night and headed back inside. Everywhere I turned this man was there. Next to me at the bar, dancing behind me, waiting outside the toilet. I realised that this isn’t just coincidence anymore so I tried to avoid him at all costs, only to end up have him gyrating and ‘grinding’ behind me on the dance floor. I politely told him to leave me alone and get off to which he obviously wasn’t best pleased so he decided to grab my friend and inappropriately touch her. We finally managed to get him off her and the bouncers promptly threw him out and barred him.
But my question is why do they think they have the right? If anyone can help me with that I would very much appreciate it.
Thankyou,
Lorna xo
"NATIONAL CRUELTY LINE: 0300 1234 999"
In a follow up to the Staffie rant, I have researched more into it.
It seems that RSPCA’s all around the country have a high number of Staffie’s brought it or left on their doorstep.
Even the TV show House, when showing a dog attack used a Staffie. It’s unfair and unwanted media attention like this that causes people to assume danger. You don’t see a Collie going on the rampage do you? Staffie’s are bullied!
And finally, I was reading the local Worcester Journal, and came across a piece only three sentences long at the bottom of a page asking people to stop leaving Staffie’s on the street because of the sudden rise, the RSPCA can’t cope. How disgusting is that? Human beings leaving animals that they have brought up in their homes to fend for themselves. It breaks my heart. It really does. It is so unjust.
To everyone that has abused an animal, or left them on the street, Karma will bite you hard one day.
Much love,
Lorna xo
At the moment I am on a bit of a rampage about Staffordshire Terriers. They should not be banned. That ‘MP’, if you can call him that, George Galloway has now decided he is going to try pass a bill where Staffie’s will be outcast, just like the Pitbull. What I don’t understand is how he can still hold an MP position. Pretending to be a cat on Big Brother, wearing a lycra leotard and dancing with Pete Burns, in fact going on Big Brother full stop! No self-respecting member of Parliament would go on that show. They wouldn’t need the cheap publicity if they were a deserving MP. They would already be listened too. Old Georgey boy got the wrong publicity: humiliation.
So back to my previous point, how has he got the right to dictate whether Staffie’s should be banned or not. How was he got the right to even give this notion? I fully stand by the point that it’s the owner NOT the dog. I understand that Staffie’s can be aggressive, but so can all dogs. The only difference is Staffie’s have a very strong jaw that locks so cannot be pulled off their victim when they attack. I have a gorgeous, soft Labrador, but I assure you that if I had brought him up bullying him he would be aggressive but wouldn’t be able to cause as much damage as a Staffie. So there’s the difference. Maybe they should like about monitoring the owners? Bring in strict bog licensing. Watch who breed and who buys them. I’m sorry to stereotype but the aggressive dogs are mainly owned by young lads who want to be able to say, ‘Oi mate by dogs ‘arder than yours’. It’s a status symbol, that’s all they are to them. So maybe ban them from having Staffordshire Terriers?
If I murdered someone, does my whole family get put in jail? All my relatives? No. We don’t all get tarred with the same brush so it’s the same for dog breeds. Today its Staffie’s, tomorrow it’s going to be Rottweiler’s and the next day the bloody Chihuahua. It’s just a spiral from one dog breed to the next. There is ALWAYS going to be a dog breed that has the highest incidents involving them, but as soon as you remove the top one, the second rated with be highest and so on. It’s the same with humans, there is always going to be one race or gender or age group that has the highest crime rate, does that mean we just simply ban all them?
It’s simply not fair.
Regards,
Lorna xo